If I totally agree with that then why I give few stars is the big question. Accepting this comment fully means I wanted to correct myself in relation to self reflection. I also accepted this comment (be it positive/negative) because I am a die-hard lover of films, in general. Nevertheless, there is a genuine egoistic vigor that runs in my blood that says, “Mustho.., hit the bull’s eye every time you review our films.” My curiosity in studying the psychology of films, its making and its impact on audience is purely a passionate venture.
Ladies and gentlemen!…No need to have worries…Keep on doing the good work..!
I love movies of any kind, culture or language, be it good or bad, whether they are being measured by any relative standard of human experience. Even I love the ‘bad movies’ in the eyes of many critics because of the so-called ‘badness’. They teach you a lot like those that won Oscars. All these terms are very relative in the best sense of Einstein.
When I started reviewing the movies on an invitation from MNBC One, I looked for my best professor’s maxims, theories I have learned and experimented and even what other experts have said about reviewing and criticism- what they said about this and that. My learning is a long journey and it is still continuing, despite I have a qualification of this and that or whatever achievement I have earned which is purely just another ‘hindsight’ for me.
Why I am critical of most of our movies is because I am an idealist when it comes to movies. This idealism is what I wanted to see as the goal we should reach in making films and my objective of criticism is to look rationally how we could reach that in the creative process of film making. It does not matter whatever contradiction you may find in this statement.
My rating in terms of a star or rather 0-5 point scale is based on this belief of mine. It is partly based on expert opinions that justify a movie's worthiness of watching, by seeing how much a movie maker has given justice to film genre, the creative process and what they promise to deliver on, for the audience.
If a movie is lacking in these aspects during my scrutiny, I will give a low rating…!
I also agree with the claim by some that the Maldivian Film Industry is in its infancy, at present. To substantiate this point they keep on saying like a crying baby that, ‘Mustho..! Come on..! Have a heart to them..They cannot reach to the level of Hollywood..Your rating is very biased’. These are genuine human emotions I understand quite well. But for me, these emotions are excuses of laziness and not willing to come out of one’s comfort zone. The irony is we have done everything that the Bollywood has done so far, while we refuse to seek other avenues.
However, in reflection to these views I find something interesting in the word 'biased'. Yes, some could say, from Loodhifa to Hithey Dheymee, my reviews and criticism were harsh and ratings too low. So what to do then..? Do I need to increase my rating a little bit in saving the Industry’s dying business and prompting the creative process of our artists?
If my criticism ruins your business and my doing otherwise helps to do a good sale then let’s be little humble. From my next target- Zahar onwards I will raise the lever, but if so I have to give a higher rating to the previous movies I have rated. Then, Loodhifa will earn a 4 star, Saza- 3 star, Hafaraiy- 1, Hithey Dheymee- 1 and Zahar 2.5 star.
But in future no further changes… Ladies and Gentlemen!
This is because I am simply in love with movies. No regrets. CHEERS.